AIEWF 2026: Build Evals that actually matter

ArticleTalk

A slide deck from the AIEWF 2026 event titled 'Build Evals that actually matter'. The slide contents were not captured in the extracted text.

Key points

  1. Presentation deck from AIEWF 2026.
  2. Focuses on developing effective evaluation metrics and processes according to the title.
  3. The raw source contains only Google Slides UI elements without slide text.

Why it matters

Evaluation design is critical for validating generative AI models and agents, but specific guidance cannot be determined without access to the slide content.

Analysis

The source is an inaccessible or unrendered Google Presentation page. Only the document title is known.

Found in

Summary generated by AI (Gemini 3.8 Flash, 27 September 2026). It may contain errors – the original source is authoritative.

Similar in content, found by the AI search.

  • Video

    Video:AI Engineer

    Building Production-Grade Agent Evals: Lessons from Lyft

    Nick Ung and Akshay Sharma from Lyft present an end-to-end framework for evaluating customer support AI agents. They detail why default offline simulations produce misleading pass rates and show how fine-tuned adversarial user simulators and calibrated LLM judges create trustworthy benchmarks.

    AI & LLMs· Talk

  • Video

    Video:AI Engineer

    Don't Ship Skills Without Evals: Best Practices from Google DeepMind

    Google DeepMind's Philipp Schmid explains why AI agent skills require systematic evaluation suites and how to build lightweight eval harnesses. Drawing on data from SkillsBench and internal practices at Google, he outlines how to write, structure, test, and eventually deprecate skills as foundation models improve.

    AI & LLMs· Talk

  • Link:Diogo Almeida

    What's Next After RLHF? Why Reliable Automation Demands a Different Objective

    Speaking at the AI Engineer World's Fair 2026, Diogo Almeida (formerly on GPT-4 and InstructGPT, now at TypeSafe AI) argues that RLHF successfully created the assistant era, but falls short for unattended automation. Because RLHF optimises for human preference, models lean towards sounding convincing rather than being reliably correct. Achieving dependable background automation requires shifting towards calibrated, verifiable decision-making.

    AI & LLMs· Talk

  • Article:Kuldeep Paul

    Comparison of Five No-Code AI Agent Builders and Evaluation Strategies

    A guide by Maxim AI reviews five prominent no-code platforms for building AI agents and highlights why systematic evaluation is critical before deployment. By exposing HTTP endpoints or webhooks, agents built in n8n, Gumloop, MindStudio, Lindy, and Relevance AI can be tested systematically against quality and reliability metrics.

    AI & LLMs· Resource

Let's talk about your project

Locations

  • Mattersburg
    Johann Nepomuk Bergerstraße 7/2/14
    7210 Mattersburg, Austria
  • Vienna
    Ungargasse 64-66/3/404
    1030 Wien, Austria

Parts of this content were created with the assistance of AI.